Anne hathaway sex video havoc

Rent "Kids" or "Thirteen" instead; both films are about topics similar to this movie and both are far better. When all is said and done, the amount of nudity in this movie only made it worse; when you factor the amount of it in along with in how disappointing the movie is, it only adds evidence to the argument that the only reason this movie exists was for Hathaway to prove to us just how far she was willing to go to avoid being typecast as Princess Mia Thermopolis for the rest of her acting career Because of Hathaway's talent as an actress, as well as her successful exploitation of the public's predominant perception of her as a wholesome girl next door for this film, it is easy for the audience to believe that Hathaway's character is the rebel-without-a-clue fish out of water that the script is trying to portray her as. That alone will do more to land you mature roles than taking off your top for sex scenes in a poorly-scripted indie movie ever will. Hathaway's acting is superb, head and shoulders above anyone else in the film, which adds to her character's legitimacy. Although one must consider the fact that the screenplay was for the most part written by a year-old girl before judging it, it is disappointing that an Academy Award-winning co-writer with some experience with this genre of film Stephen Gaghan could not give the screenplay and characters a more authentic feel. The movie WANTS to make a powerful statement about spoiled, naive, pseudo-disillusioned youths searching for identity in the superficial only to receive a colossal reality check when they realize the life they've been imitating isn't as glamorous as they had thought. The script, despite its many shortcomings, succeeds in making it clear just how self-aware, intelligent, and capable of good Hathaway's character is, in spite of her actions as a member of the gang of rich white teens, giving the film its lone three-dimensional character. Unfortunately, this noble message is lost in a weak script and characters that are either one-dimensional, unbelievable or both. While a case can be made that most of the nudity in the film was appropriate when considering the context of the scenes in which it was featured, I find myself questioning just how "necessary" it is, for example, to show Hathaway's character popping her top while making out with her boyfriend or for that matter, to see Bijou Phillips' character in the film topless while taking a bubble bath. The movie's lone saving grace is Anne Hathaway. But Hathaway is topless just enough in this film to make this obvious attempt to expand her acting repertoire beyond the roles in family films she had previously been limited to seem heavy-handed and maybe even a little desperate.